Perplexity Visibility Tracker and the sources behind every answer

Run a fixed set of buyer questions through it on a schedule and record, for each one, whether your brand was named and which URLs were cited. Enter your domain above for a free check: Koalr writes three buyer questions for your category, asks Perplexity, and returns the named brands and the cited sources.

It retrieves pages that answer the question directly and clearly, then summarises them. Pages that state an answer plainly near the top tend to be cited more than pages that build to a conclusion slowly. Being cited is not the same as being recommended, and Koalr records the two separately.

Yes, and it is a common and frustrating pattern. Your page can be used as a source for the explanation while a competitor is named as the choice. That means your content is teaching the answer and someone else is collecting the credit, and it needs a different fix from simply being absent.

By being on the pages it already retrieves for your category, which are usually not your own. In our citation research, 84% of citations point at pages the mentioned brand does not own. So the work is a mix of earning a place in the comparisons and roundups it reads, and making your own pages easy to extract a direct answer from.

Often not. In our own testing the same question put to Perplexity and Claude produced almost no overlap in the brands named. That is exactly why tracking a single engine gives a false read, and why Koalr covers all seven on every plan.